IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v14y1995i3-4p323-338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Logistic Regression to make County‐level Estimates of the Medically Uninsured in North Carolina

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas C. Ricketts
  • Donald H. Taylor
  • Lucy A. Savitz

Abstract

Often, policy analysts are asked to produce data for which there are no universally accepted methods. Policymakers and legislators are continually searching for accurate estimates of the magnitude of the problem with which to inform their debate, but often need the estimates within a short period of time—too short to allow large, population‐based sample surveys. This means that such estimates must be produced from data that may lack the specificity sought by policymakers and legislators, using techniques not perfectly suited for the analysis. The recent focus on health care financing policies has created a situation where estimates of the number of medically uninsured persons are key to decision‐making about coverage policies. This article describes the use of the 1992 Current Population Survey and logistic regression analysis to explain the determinants of women of childbearing age in North Carolina without medical insurance, and to develop county‐level estimates of their population. This is an example of using logistic regression as a fool for prediction and projection of data crucial to the policymaking process as well as adapting a method normally used in the academic environment to the policy world.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas C. Ricketts & Donald H. Taylor & Lucy A. Savitz, 1995. "Using Logistic Regression to make County‐level Estimates of the Medically Uninsured in North Carolina," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 14(3‐4), pages 323-338, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:14:y:1995:i:3-4:p:323-338
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1995.tb00714.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1995.tb00714.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1995.tb00714.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:14:y:1995:i:3-4:p:323-338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.