IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v11y1992i2p24-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Failure of Success in Natural Resource Policy: Pacific Salmon Harvest Policy in New York State

Author

Listed:
  • Nancy A. Connelly
  • Barbara A. Knuth
  • Chad P. Dawson

Abstract

Natural resource management policies like the Pacific salmon harvest policy developed by New York State often did not anticipate the extent of social, economic, and ethical concerns that would be generated, largely because the agency concentrated on biological considerations. The number of concerned stakeholders grew in proportion to both the success and failure of the initial policy. Had all participants been equally willing to recognize both the successes and the failures, development of a revised policy through group negotiations may have been possible, resulting in a cooperative mode of decision making. Instead, institutional mechanisms based on legislated process were ultimately the approach chosen for policy revision.

Suggested Citation

  • Nancy A. Connelly & Barbara A. Knuth & Chad P. Dawson, 1992. "The Failure of Success in Natural Resource Policy: Pacific Salmon Harvest Policy in New York State," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 11(2), pages 24-36, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:11:y:1992:i:2:p:24-36
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1992.tb00388.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1992.tb00388.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1992.tb00388.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:11:y:1992:i:2:p:24-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.