IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revinw/v72y2026i2ne70064.html

Unpacking the Contribution of Birth Circumstances to Inequality Using a Shapley Decomposition: The Case of Chile

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Gradín
  • Gabriela Zapata‐Román

Abstract

This study examines the role of inherited circumstances in labor market inequality of opportunity in Chile. We estimate their contribution as the change in total inequality after removing their influence. Since this contribution may differ depending on whether it is measured before or after removing the influence of other factors, we use the Shapley decomposition method. Traditional path‐dependent decompositions misrepresent the role of circumstances by ignoring their interaction with inter‐ and intra‐group inequality—overstating (Gini) or understating (entropy‐based measures). Circumstances explained 27%–28% of inequality in 2022 using entropy measures, and 17% when emphasizing outcomes for the poorest. In contrast, the Gini index attributes 36% of inequality to circumstances. Despite some fluctuations, inequality of opportunity has remained persistent and a key driver of overall inequality since the financial crisis. We also apply a Recentered Influence Function decomposition to examine the specific contributions of different population groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Gradín & Gabriela Zapata‐Román, 2026. "Unpacking the Contribution of Birth Circumstances to Inequality Using a Shapley Decomposition: The Case of Chile," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 72(2), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:72:y:2026:i:2:n:e70064
    DOI: 10.1111/roiw.70064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.70064
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/roiw.70064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:72:y:2026:i:2:n:e70064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iariwea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.