IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revinw/v65y2019i3p657-674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lexical Measures of Social Inequality: From Pigou‐Dalton to Hammond

Author

Listed:
  • Kui Ou‐Yang

Abstract

A measure of social inequality is essentially a rational ordering over a space of social distributions. However, different measures, including the most popular ones, may provide very different rankings over the same set of typical distributions. We thus propose an axiomatic approach to inequality measurement mainly based on the Hammond principle, a natural generalization of the Pigou‐Dalton principle, attempting to clarify the true nature of social inequality: the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Under the standard assumptions of anonymity and scale independence, we show that a social inequality ordering is the leximinimax measure if and only if it satisfies the first Hammond principle, and it is the leximaximin measure if and only if it satisfies the second Hammond principle.

Suggested Citation

  • Kui Ou‐Yang, 2019. "Lexical Measures of Social Inequality: From Pigou‐Dalton to Hammond," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 65(3), pages 657-674, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:65:y:2019:i:3:p:657-674
    DOI: 10.1111/roiw.12402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12402
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/roiw.12402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:65:y:2019:i:3:p:657-674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iariwea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.