IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revinw/v25y1979i2p209-224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stocks And Depreciation Of Human Capital: New Evidence From A Present‐Value Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • John W. Graham
  • Roy H. Webb

Abstract

Responding to a perceived growing interest in human wealth estimates, this paper offers a framework for measuring the aggregate stock of human capital and then implements the procedure for the United States male population age 14 to 75. Unlike previous estimates of human wealth that are based upon historical or resource costs, these estimates measure the capital stock as the discounted resent‐value of expected lifetime returns. In the estimation, returns are equated with earnings data from the 1970 U.S. Census 15 percent Public Use Sample for out‐of‐school males, adjusted for employment and survival probabilities, adjusted for an assumed exogenous growth in future earnings, and discounted at 7.5 percent. We provide cross‐sectional estimates of individual stocks of human capital by age and educational attainment, as well as expected lifetime wealth profiles for individuals by level of education. These individual profiles can be used to obtain direct estimates of age‐specific depreciation which suggest human capital is subject to significant and prolonged appreciation before nearly straight‐line depreciation begins around middle age. This finding is all the more significant since resource‐cost estimates of human capital which must assume a depreciation pattern to obtain stocks have always imposed a much faster rate much sooner. Finally, an aggregate estimate of the stock of human capital for all males is supplied and its sensitivity to the choice of the discount rate, tax laws, and expected exogenous growth is analyzed. This seemingly‐conservative stock estimate is then compared to a much lower resource‐cost estimate offered recently by John Kendrick. A discount rate over 20 percent would be needed to equate the two measures. In trying to reconcile the two figures, we raise some new questions about the validity of both approaches for human capital accounting.

Suggested Citation

  • John W. Graham & Roy H. Webb, 1979. "Stocks And Depreciation Of Human Capital: New Evidence From A Present‐Value Perspective," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 25(2), pages 209-224, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:25:y:1979:i:2:p:209-224
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.1979.tb00094.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1979.tb00094.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1979.tb00094.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Balogh, Gábor & Szabó-Bálint, Brigitta & Uhrin, Anett, 2023. "A közgazdászhallgatók reális vagy irreális bérvárakozásait befolyásoló tényezők és a munkatapasztalat összefüggései [The factors influencing business students' realistic and unrealistic salary expe," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(11), pages 1261-1287.
    2. Yurii Safonov & Viktoriia Borshch & Mykhailo Danylko, 2023. "Human Capital Assessment Methodology," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 9(3).
    3. Trinh Le & John Gibson & Les Oxley, 2003. "Cost‐ and Income‐based Measures of Human Capital," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(3), pages 271-307, July.
    4. Satis Devkota & Shankar Ghimire & Mukti Upadhyay, 2021. "What Factors in Nepal Account for the Rural–Urban Discrepancy in Human Capital? Evidence from Household Survey Data," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:25:y:1979:i:2:p:209-224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iariwea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.