IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/reviec/v34y2026i4p859-876.html

Cultural Proximity and Bilateral Trade Costs

Author

Listed:
  • Luz Saavedra
  • Tim Spilde

Abstract

We draw on recently derived measures of trade costs to test whether two measures of cultural proximity, bilateral trust and scores from the Eurovision Song Contest (ESC), are associated with trade costs. After controlling for distance, common border, geographical barriers, and other cultural proximity variables and using Ordinary Least Squares and Pseudo‐Poisson estimation, we find that higher trust and ESC scores are associated with lower bilateral trade costs. Interestingly, and consistent with the literature on informational barriers, the negative cost association between ESC scores and trade costs is substantially stronger for trade in manufacturing (differentiated) goods and negligible for agricultural (homogeneous) goods, and the magnitude of the effect increases when using Instrumental Variable (IV) estimation. Furthermore, we find that the association between ESC scores and bilateral trade costs remains statistically significant and robust across all our specifications, whereas the association between trust and trade costs is less robust under some specifications. Overall, our results suggest that ESC scores capture a trade‐cost channel rather than operating solely through preferences as suggested in earlier studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Luz Saavedra & Tim Spilde, 2026. "Cultural Proximity and Bilateral Trade Costs," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 859-876, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:reviec:v:34:y:2026:i:4:p:859-876
    DOI: 10.1111/roie.70055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.70055
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/roie.70055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:reviec:v:34:y:2026:i:4:p:859-876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0965-7576 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.