IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/reviec/v34y2026i3p579-596.html

U.S.‐China Trade Tensions and Their Supply Chain Relationships: Evidence From U.S. Listed Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Changyuan Luo
  • Ning Wang

Abstract

Based on the data of U.S. listed firms from 2015 to 2021, this paper uses a difference‐in‐differences model to empirically investigate the impact of the 2018 U.S.‐China trade tensions on the supply chain arrangements of U.S. firms with China. The baseline estimation results indicate that after the trade tensions, U.S. firms have reduced their supply chain dependence on China. The results of the mechanism analyses imply that based on an implicit policy logic of “more imports, more restrictions,” the U.S. has restrained the supply chains related to China through raising import tariffs, expanding export controls, and strengthening supply chain reviews. The results of heterogeneity analyses find that U.S. firms in high‐tech industries, those with specific supply chain relationships, and those with weak market power have significantly reduced their dependence on China. The results of extended analyses reveal that after the occurrence of the trade tensions, the supply chain arrangements of U.S. firms have shown a trend of “China plus N” and “prioritizing near‐shoring and friend‐shoring.” There is a “de‐risking” trend in U.S. supply chain arrangements with China, even though they have not yet developed into a “decoupling” state.

Suggested Citation

  • Changyuan Luo & Ning Wang, 2026. "U.S.‐China Trade Tensions and Their Supply Chain Relationships: Evidence From U.S. Listed Firms," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 579-596, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:reviec:v:34:y:2026:i:3:p:579-596
    DOI: 10.1111/roie.70039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.70039
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/roie.70039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:reviec:v:34:y:2026:i:3:p:579-596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0965-7576 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.