IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/reviec/v34y2026i1p95-109.html

Environmental Regulation or Financial Constraint? Estimating the Effect of the Green Credit Guidelines on Trade

Author

Listed:
  • Miaomiao Zou
  • Jiayan Liu
  • Hao Guo

Abstract

China's rapid economic growth has come at a significant environmental cost, prompting policymakers to balance sustainability with development. To advance sustainable economic development, the China Banking Regulatory Commission implemented the Green Credit Guidelines (GCG) in 2012, establishing standards and principles for green credit in the banking industry. By imposing credit constraints on high‐pollution industries, the GCG could affect not only production but also the imports and exports of high‐pollution products. This study uses credit‐unconstrained products as a comparison group and employs a difference‐in‐difference method to determine whether the promulgation of the GCG altered trade flows of credit‐constrained products. Our difference‐in‐difference estimates indicate that the GCG has inhibitory effects on both imports and exports of credit‐constrained products, as the GCG limits bank loan financing for high‐pollution firms. Firm‐level analysis further shows that pollution‐intensive firms reduced their trade in credit‐constrained products.

Suggested Citation

  • Miaomiao Zou & Jiayan Liu & Hao Guo, 2026. "Environmental Regulation or Financial Constraint? Estimating the Effect of the Green Credit Guidelines on Trade," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 95-109, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:reviec:v:34:y:2026:i:1:p:95-109
    DOI: 10.1111/roie.70015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.70015
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/roie.70015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:reviec:v:34:y:2026:i:1:p:95-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0965-7576 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.