IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/reviec/v33y2025i5p1093-1114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Repairing a Historical Mistake in Bilateral FDI Statistics: A New Dataset Covering 2001–2022

Author

Listed:
  • Henk L. M. Kox

Abstract

The statistics on foreign direct investment (FDI) used to be important quantifiers of ownership‐based control over foreign companies. However, during the 2008 financial crisis, IMF and OECD changed the FDI definition to obtain more information on intra‐company finance activity. They did so by giving cross‐border loans between affiliated subsidiaries (within the same parent firm) the same status as acquiring ownership of foreign firms. The change became effective in 2013. The paper shows that it resulted in a systematic drop of quality and consistency of FDI statistics, while causing massive double counting. It made comparison between pre‐ and post‐2013 FDI statistics impossible. We propose a methodology to repair this historical mistake by emulating the pre‐2013 FDI definition, which was based primarily on FDI assets. The paper provides a full proof‐of‐concept with a dataset holding bilateral FDI between 232 jurisdictions over the period 2001–2022. The dataset is strictly based on reported data; it uses no estimation or imputation. The new dataset is evaluated quantitatively by a comparison with the original source data. The paper also quantifies the dimensions and the country structure of ‘phantom FDI’ that resulted from current double‐counting practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Henk L. M. Kox, 2025. "Repairing a Historical Mistake in Bilateral FDI Statistics: A New Dataset Covering 2001–2022," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 1093-1114, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:reviec:v:33:y:2025:i:5:p:1093-1114
    DOI: 10.1111/roie.70004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.70004
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/roie.70004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:reviec:v:33:y:2025:i:5:p:1093-1114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0965-7576 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.