IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/reviec/v33y2025i4p886-897.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Economic Integration Agreements Increase Members' Migration? Accounting for Migration in Trade Agreements

Author

Listed:
  • Scott L. Baier
  • Ward M. Reesman

Abstract

A substantial body of literature establishes that economic integration agreements (EIAs) facilitate trade among member countries. However, their impact on migration flows remains less understood. In this paper, we construct a stylized spatial general equilibrium model to study the impact of economic integration agreements on trade and migration. The model is similar to that of Allen and Arkolakis (2014) and Redding and Rossi‐Hansberg (2017), and yields structural gravity equations for both trade and migration that allow us to estimate the direct impact of trade agreements on trade and migration flows. Given these parameter estimates, we can simulate the spatial model to highlight the general equilibrium effects of trade agreements on trade and migration. In our simulation exercise, we show that if the United States‐Mexico‐Canada Agreement (USMCA) were modified to have the trade‐creating effect of a common market, it would foster more trade within the group and encourage in‐migration from outside the trading bloc. If the USMCA were also modified to allow migration costs to fall to the level of a common market, the within‐migration impact on trade and welfare would be more modest.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott L. Baier & Ward M. Reesman, 2025. "Do Economic Integration Agreements Increase Members' Migration? Accounting for Migration in Trade Agreements," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 886-897, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:reviec:v:33:y:2025:i:4:p:886-897
    DOI: 10.1111/roie.12810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12810
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/roie.12810?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:reviec:v:33:y:2025:i:4:p:886-897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0965-7576 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.