IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/reesec/v46y2018i3p698-738.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Servicer Contracts and the Design of Mortgage‐Backed Security Pools

Author

Listed:
  • Robert M. Mooradian
  • Pegaret Pichler

Abstract

We develop a unified model of mortgage and servicer contracts. Renegotiating mortgage contracts following default is strictly Pareto improving, if the lender gathers updated information. An incentive compatible servicer contract requires the servicer to hold a risk position that has a value strictly greater than the cost of exerting effort. This risk position cannot in general be approximated with a horizontal “first‐loss” position. An alternative, forming a nondiversified pool, preserves pool‐wide information, avoids the cost of an incentive compatible servicer contract, and may increase MBS value.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert M. Mooradian & Pegaret Pichler, 2018. "Servicer Contracts and the Design of Mortgage‐Backed Security Pools," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 46(3), pages 698-738, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:reesec:v:46:y:2018:i:3:p:698-738
    DOI: 10.1111/1540-6229.12188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12188
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1540-6229.12188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Walter D'Lima & Luis Arturo Lopez, 2021. "Trustee affiliation and servicer oversight: Evidence from CMBS markets," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 49(3), pages 699-732, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:reesec:v:46:y:2018:i:3:p:698-738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/areueea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.