IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/reesec/v24y1996i4p551-563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Note on Ranking Real Estate Research Journals

Author

Listed:
  • Julian Diaz
  • Roy T. Black
  • Joseph Rabianski

Abstract

An understanding of how thirty real estate journals are perceived for promotion and tenure and for professional applicability was sought by surveying members of the two most important real estate academic organizations. Several subgroup comparisons were made revealing some common perceptions but a significant amount of disagreement as well. Among findings robust across the surveyed community were that the Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association (changed to Real Estate Economics in 1995) is the most important outlet for promotion and tenure and the Appraisal Journal is the most important outlet for professional applicability. Two distinct journal groupings emerged: an academic group composed of eight journals and a professional group of twenty.

Suggested Citation

  • Julian Diaz & Roy T. Black & Joseph Rabianski, 1996. "A Note on Ranking Real Estate Research Journals," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 24(4), pages 551-563, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:reesec:v:24:y:1996:i:4:p:551-563
    DOI: 10.1111/1540-6229.00704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00704
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1540-6229.00704?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Serenko, Alexander & Bontis, Nick, 2013. "First in, best dressed: The presence of order-effect bias in journal ranking surveys," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 138-144.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:reesec:v:24:y:1996:i:4:p:551-563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/areueea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.