IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rdevec/v30y2026i4p2697-2726.html

Sustainable but Uncertain: How Investor Sentiment Shapes Stock Returns Across Different‐Sized Firms in an Emerging Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Zhu Naiping
  • Richard Wiredu
  • Timothy Masuni Nagriwum
  • Abigail Asare

Abstract

This study examines how investor sentiment affects the relationship between sustainability uncertainty and stock returns across different firm sizes in China's emerging market. Using a 21‐year panel of 2310 Chinese‐listed firms, we show that investor sentiment is a pivotal channel through which sustainability uncertainty is priced. Higher ESG‐based uncertainty (ESGUI) depresses monthly returns, but the effect is fully mediated by sentiment for small‐caps and only partially for mid‐ and large‐caps. In bullish markets, sentiment amplifies the discount, whereas in bearish regimes it cushions the fall. Large‐cap stocks suffer the steepest penalty because ESG‐screened institutions re‐balance at the first hint of ambiguity, while small‐caps can even gain as retail investors treat uncertainty as a growth option. Robustness is confirmed with an alternative Baker‐Wurgler index, 1000‐bootstrap errors, and regime‐split estimations. The findings imply that regulators can curb volatility by tightening ESG disclosure, and investors should size‐tilt portfolios according to sentiment‐driven sustainability risk rather than fundamentals alone.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhu Naiping & Richard Wiredu & Timothy Masuni Nagriwum & Abigail Asare, 2026. "Sustainable but Uncertain: How Investor Sentiment Shapes Stock Returns Across Different‐Sized Firms in an Emerging Economy," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2697-2726, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:30:y:2026:i:4:p:2697-2726
    DOI: 10.1111/rode.70133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.70133
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rode.70133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:30:y:2026:i:4:p:2697-2726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1363-6669 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.