IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rdevec/v30y2026i4p2302-2325.html

Do Industrial Robots Lower Employment Quality for Manufacturing Migrant Workers in China?

Author

Listed:
  • Qian Kang
  • Zhoufu Yan
  • Ali Sher

Abstract

China's 297.35 million migrant workers face the challenge of improving their livelihoods, maintaining social stability, and securing high‐quality employment. However, the impact of automation on the quality of their employment remains unclear, with concerns that automation may diminish employment quality for this group. This study utilizes data from the China Labor Dynamics Survey (CLDS) and applies robust statistical methods to assess the effect of industrial robots on the employment quality of migrant workers in China. The findings reveal a U‐shaped relationship between the use of industrial robots and employment quality. Initially, employment quality declines due to skill mismatches caused by automation, but this trend reverses as the labor market adjusts to technological advancements. Furthermore, the study examines sectoral and individual differences in employment quality during the era of robotization, highlighting the moderating effects of urban scale and the household registration system. To support migrant workers in transitioning to stable and rewarding employment in an automated economy, the government should prioritize skill development programs and ensure the equitable distribution of technological benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian Kang & Zhoufu Yan & Ali Sher, 2026. "Do Industrial Robots Lower Employment Quality for Manufacturing Migrant Workers in China?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2302-2325, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:30:y:2026:i:4:p:2302-2325
    DOI: 10.1111/rode.70110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.70110
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rode.70110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:30:y:2026:i:4:p:2302-2325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1363-6669 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.