IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rdevec/v30y2026i3p2120-2136.html

Artificial Intelligence and Work Intensity: Evidence From Chinese Listed Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Lilong He
  • Xiangyang Chen
  • Juan Liu

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping labor markets at an unprecedented pace. Existing studies on the impact of AI on labor markets primarily focus on extensive margin effects, while its influence on intensive margin labor remains underexplored. This study empirically examines the effect of AI exposure on work intensity in Chinese publicly listed firms by integrating satellite nighttime lights, firm employee occupational structures, and occupation‐level AI exposure data. The results show that AI exposure significantly increases firm work intensity. This finding remains robust after using an instrumental variable approach constructed from AI patent text analysis. Substitution effects, complementarity effects, and adjustment frictions are potential channels through which AI raises firm work intensity. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the above effect is more pronounced in non‐state‐owned enterprises, industries with more intense market competition, service‐sector firms, settings with weaker labor bargaining power, and regions with higher labor market segmentation. This study not only uncovers the complex impact of technological progress on work intensity but also provides important policy implications for building fairer and more sustainable labor relations in the AI era.

Suggested Citation

  • Lilong He & Xiangyang Chen & Juan Liu, 2026. "Artificial Intelligence and Work Intensity: Evidence From Chinese Listed Firms," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 2120-2136, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:30:y:2026:i:3:p:2120-2136
    DOI: 10.1111/rode.70170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.70170
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rode.70170?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:30:y:2026:i:3:p:2120-2136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1363-6669 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.