Author
Abstract
Technological innovation by multinational enterprises (MNEs) serves as a key micro‐foundation for enhancing the quality of a country's economic development. Based on a sample of Chinese listed MNEs and leveraging United Nations General Assembly voting data, this paper theoretically analyzes and empirically examines the impact of bilateral political relations on technological innovation in MNEs. The results show that favorable bilateral political relations significantly promote technological innovation, and this conclusion remains robust across a series of robustness checks. Mechanism tests show that favorable bilateral political relations enhance technological innovation by reducing enterprise risks, alleviating financing constraints, and facilitating cross‐border technological cooperation. Further heterogeneity analysis demonstrates that in host countries with weaker institutional environments, the alternative institutional protection provided by favorable bilateral political relations can mitigate institutional risks and more effectively promote technological innovation. Additionally, when the technological gap between the home and host countries is small, favorable bilateral political relations alleviate technological competition pressure in the host country, fostering mutual trust and cooperation, thereby further enhancing innovation. Moreover, MNEs in high‐tech industries benefit more from favorable bilateral political relations in promoting technological innovation. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for optimizing MNEs' innovation strategies and international operations.
Suggested Citation
Aimin Zeng & Yuanting Tao, 2026.
"Do Bilateral Political Relations Affect the Technological Innovation of Multinational Enterprises? Evidence From China,"
Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 1865-1889, August.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:30:y:2026:i:3:p:1865-1889
DOI: 10.1111/rode.70092
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:30:y:2026:i:3:p:1865-1889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1363-6669 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.