IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rdevec/v30y2026i3p1829-1846.html

Religious Beliefs and Non‐Cash Payment: An Investigation Based on the World Bank's Global Findex Database

Author

Listed:
  • Nan Li
  • Duo Zhang

Abstract

This paper reveals the cultural factors behind the disparities in the development of non‐cash payment across different countries from the perspective of religious beliefs, using cross‐country survey data provided by the World Bank. Our findings indicate that religious beliefs as culture exert a significant influence on the use of non‐cash payments. Specifically, a higher proportion of Protestant population significantly promotes the adoption of non‐cash payments compared to other religions. These results remain robust even after controlling for a comprehensive set of factors, including economic development level, infrastructure, related institutions, and social structure. Furthermore, estimates using the local number of donated Bibles in 1900 as an IV remain consistent with our baseline OLS estimates. We also identify social trust as a primary mechanism through which Protestantism encourages the use of non‐cash payment, while the development of government credit information systems can, to some extent, mitigate the negative influence of religion on non‐cash payment adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Nan Li & Duo Zhang, 2026. "Religious Beliefs and Non‐Cash Payment: An Investigation Based on the World Bank's Global Findex Database," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 1829-1846, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:30:y:2026:i:3:p:1829-1846
    DOI: 10.1111/rode.70085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.70085
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rode.70085?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:30:y:2026:i:3:p:1829-1846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1363-6669 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.