IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rdevec/v30y2026i2p1194-1214.html

Technology Import and Biased Technological Progress in Transforming Economies: Evidence From China

Author

Listed:
  • Shangze Dai
  • James Ji
  • Haichao Yu

Abstract

Transforming economies increasingly face demographic headwinds and slowing capital accumulation and turn to technology imports from developed countries as an important strategy for bolstering growth. However, the effectiveness of this strategy depends on the direction of the technological bias it induces; labor‐saving progress can offset a shrinking workforce, while capital‐saving progress can alleviate investment slowdowns. Using a panel dataset of 282 Chinese cities from 2010 to 2019, we employ panel fixed‐effects, threshold, and spatial econometric models. We find three key results. First, technology import significantly promotes labor‐saving technological progress, suggesting that rising local labor costs dominate technological innovation. Second, this labor‐saving effect is heterogeneous, growing stronger in regions with a higher development stage, more advanced factor endowments, and higher knowledge production efficiency. Third, technology import creates negative spatial spillovers, inducing a capital‐saving bias in neighboring regions. These findings suggest that disruptions to global technology flows may hinder the ability of transforming economies to address the challenges of population aging.

Suggested Citation

  • Shangze Dai & James Ji & Haichao Yu, 2026. "Technology Import and Biased Technological Progress in Transforming Economies: Evidence From China," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1194-1214, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:30:y:2026:i:2:p:1194-1214
    DOI: 10.1111/rode.70051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.70051
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rode.70051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:30:y:2026:i:2:p:1194-1214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1363-6669 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.