Author
Listed:
- Farzan Yahya
- Syed Atif Ali
- Amad Rashid
Abstract
Optimal economic and monetary policies provide a strategic framework for guiding renewable energy investment and transformation. This study explores the relationship between Mundell‐Fleming trilemma tradeoffs and renewable energy diversification through the lens of the “impossible trinity” hypothesis. Analyzing a comprehensive dataset spanning 70 countries from 1996 to 2019, we introduce a novel measure of energy diversification. Employing advanced panel quantile regression techniques with non‐additive fixed effects, our research reveals compelling insights into the role of trilemma tradeoffs. The findings demonstrate that monetary unions emerge as a powerful catalyst for renewable energy diversification, while fully flexible exchange rate regimes and financially closed systems function as significant barriers to sustainable energy transitions. The positive impact of monetary unions and the corresponding negative influences of alternative policy approaches are most pronounced in countries characterized by high energy import dependence, substantial debt burdens, limited natural resources, and elevated energy efficiency. Notably, flexible exchange rate regimes show potential in promoting energy diversification for countries with low energy imports, particularly after achieving a certain diversification threshold. The research fundamentally suggests that monetary union represents the optimal trilemma policy configuration for promoting renewable energy diversification, even amid economic uncertainties. By highlighting the critical importance of simultaneous financial openness and exchange rate stability, this study provides strategic guidance for policymakers seeking to enhance energy security and facilitate smoother, more resilient energy transitions.
Suggested Citation
Farzan Yahya & Syed Atif Ali & Amad Rashid, 2026.
"Unpacking Mundell‐Fleming Trilemma Tradeoffs: Asymmetric Pathways to Energy Diversification,"
Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 288-312, February.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:30:y:2026:i:1:p:288-312
DOI: 10.1111/rode.70002
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:30:y:2026:i:1:p:288-312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1363-6669 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.