IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rdevec/v30y2026i1p125-139.html

COVID‐19 and the Unequal Distribution of Poverty Risks: Evidence From Urban India

Author

Listed:
  • Archana Dang
  • Mausumi Das
  • Indrani Gupta

Abstract

This paper investigates poverty transitions and household predictors associated with different states of poverty transitions in India during the pandemic's first year (2020). Following the unexpected shock brought on by COVID, economic activity slowed down, presumably pushing many households into poverty. For poverty alleviation programs, it is important to identify households that fell into poverty during COVID and remained in poverty subsequently. Our analysis finds that about 19% of individuals in urban areas who were not poor in the pre‐COVID period (2019) qualified as poor in the COVID period. Estimating a multinomial logit model for urban households, our analysis finds that vulnerable castes relative to upper castes had a higher probability of falling into poverty and remaining there. Moreover, households at the lower end of the expenditure distribution and those with household members with lower levels of education were more prone to falling back into poverty and more likely to remain in poverty. These findings suggest that those who were most vulnerable sustainably suffered the most; as a result, the pandemic worsened socioeconomic gaps that already existed across households.

Suggested Citation

  • Archana Dang & Mausumi Das & Indrani Gupta, 2026. "COVID‐19 and the Unequal Distribution of Poverty Risks: Evidence From Urban India," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 125-139, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:30:y:2026:i:1:p:125-139
    DOI: 10.1111/rode.13268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13268
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rode.13268?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:30:y:2026:i:1:p:125-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1363-6669 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.