IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rdevec/v29y2025i4p2043-2062.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equal Opportunity Sensitive Aggregate Wellbeing Measurement: Food Security and Basic Household Income on Sub‐Sahara African Farms

Author

Listed:
  • Gordon Anderson
  • Ana Manero
  • Henning Bjornlund

Abstract

Equality of Opportunity and gender equality, key components of the UNs' Sustainable Development Goals and Inclusive Growth initiatives, require wellbeing measures that reflect the extent to which such targets are being achieved. From a measurement perspective, the Equal Opportunity literature distinguishes between inequalities arising from individual choice and inequalities engendered by circumstances beyond individual control, only the latter should enter the calculus. However, common metrics of socio‐economic inequality make no such distinction confounding different inequality sources and obfuscating potential intervention pathways. Using recent intertemporal data from family farms on four Zimbabwean and Tanzanian irrigation schemes, this study introduces and exemplifies new methods for measuring Equality of Opportunity multidimensionally within an overall wellbeing framework. Results indicate a deterioration in equality of opportunity in access to land, with an improvement in equality of opportunity in revenue generation, with the former outweighing the latter in a joint analysis resulting in a decline in overall wellbeing.

Suggested Citation

  • Gordon Anderson & Ana Manero & Henning Bjornlund, 2025. "Equal Opportunity Sensitive Aggregate Wellbeing Measurement: Food Security and Basic Household Income on Sub‐Sahara African Farms," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 2043-2062, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:29:y:2025:i:4:p:2043-2062
    DOI: 10.1111/rode.13176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13176
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rode.13176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:29:y:2025:i:4:p:2043-2062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1363-6669 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.