IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rdevec/v29y2025i3p1808-1833.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Pollution Control Foster Innovation? Quasi‐Experimental Evidence From China's Two‐Control Zone Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Isea Cieply
  • Feicheng Wang

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of environmental regulation on firms' innovation by analyzing the two‐control zone (TCZ) policy in China. This policy imposed stricter sulfur dioxide emission requirements on firms in regulated cities. Leveraging its uneven implementation across regions, we compare the innovative development of firms in cities subject to stricter environmental regulations with those that were not. Using a comprehensive dataset of firm patent applications between 1995 and 2007, we find that firms in regulated regions increased their patent applications following the introduction of the TCZ policy compared to those in unregulated regions, suggesting an innovation‐enhancing impact of stricter environmental policies. Channel analysis reveals that this positive impact was associated with firms' innovation capabilities through human capital and R&D investments, government support, financial resources, and market selection favoring innovative firms. We also find stronger effects among firms in low‐emission industries and cities with stringent policy enforcement. These findings align with the weak variant of the Porter Hypothesis that predicts a positive effect of environmental regulation on innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Isea Cieply & Feicheng Wang, 2025. "Does Pollution Control Foster Innovation? Quasi‐Experimental Evidence From China's Two‐Control Zone Policy," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1808-1833, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:29:y:2025:i:3:p:1808-1833
    DOI: 10.1111/rode.13182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13182
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rode.13182?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:29:y:2025:i:3:p:1808-1833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1363-6669 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.