IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rdevec/v29y2025i3p1613-1633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk and Time Preferences Among the Urban Poor in Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Miriam Al Lily
  • Sabine Liebenehm

Abstract

This paper investigates behavioral attitudes toward risk and time among the urban poor in Saudi Arabia by conducting an incentivized lab‐in‐the‐field experiment and exploring the correlations between these attitudes and demographic and socioeconomic characteristics that are relevant in the Saudi context. Specifically, the focus of this research is on cultural and religious indicators related to Bedouin heritage and the strength of religious beliefs as well as a set of different proxies for poverty, including income, assets, social welfare payments, and social capital. Accordingly, we define a discounted utility model, where we apply prospect theory and quasihyperbolic discounting. We then jointly estimate participants' risk and time preferences via a maximum likelihood approach. Our results suggest that, on average, poor urban Saudis exhibit high levels of risk aversion and patience; these findings are similar to those reported in other studies that have investigated Muslim respondents in rural settings. We also reveal that stronger religious beliefs are associated with higher levels of risk‐taking and a stronger preference for the present, whereas Bedouin heritage and asset‐related poverty in terms of home ownership and savings are related to higher levels of risk aversion and impatience.

Suggested Citation

  • Miriam Al Lily & Sabine Liebenehm, 2025. "Risk and Time Preferences Among the Urban Poor in Saudi Arabia," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1613-1633, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:29:y:2025:i:3:p:1613-1633
    DOI: 10.1111/rode.13178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13178
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rode.13178?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:29:y:2025:i:3:p:1613-1633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1363-6669 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.