IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rdevec/v29y2025i3p1379-1392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Inequality of Opportunity in Stunting Among Chinese Children and Adolescents: An Urban–Rural Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Nie
  • Xili Lin

Abstract

Inequality of opportunity (IOp) in stunting arises when disparities are linked to observable circumstances beyond a child/adolescent's control, such as socioeconomic background or environmental characteristics. We use data from the 1991–2015 China Nutrition and Health Survey (CNHS) to investigate the overall level and temporal changes in inequality of opportunity (IOp) in stunting among Chinese children and adolescents aged 0–18 years while also investigating the underlying factors contributing to this inequality. Additionally, we identify the differences in IOp between children and adolescents in rural and urban areas, how these differences change over time, and how circumstances affect IOp differently in rural and urban areas. For the entire sample, the relative share of IOp in stunting in China is 3.34%, with similar levels in urban (3.47%) and rural areas (3.44%), possibly due to the presence of similarly disadvantaged subgroups in both settings, albeit driven by differing underlying factors of disadvantage. The IOp in stunting mostly stems from region and household socioeconomic status. Over time, the incidence of IOp in stunting has decreased, with differences between urban and rural children and adolescents shrinking. The contribution of parental health has become more significant over time. Heterogeneity analysis further revealed that boys, older children and adolescents, and those from the western region experienced greater IOp in stunting. Continued efforts are thus needed to improve access to affordable nutritious foods, healthcare, and nutrition education, especially in rural and Western China.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Nie & Xili Lin, 2025. "Understanding the Inequality of Opportunity in Stunting Among Chinese Children and Adolescents: An Urban–Rural Comparison," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1379-1392, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:29:y:2025:i:3:p:1379-1392
    DOI: 10.1111/rode.13246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13246
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rode.13246?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:29:y:2025:i:3:p:1379-1392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1363-6669 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.