IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/randje/v56y2025i4p689-707.html

Estimating Complementarity With Large Choice Sets: An Application to Mergers

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Ershov
  • Jean‐William Laliberté
  • Mathieu Marcoux
  • Scott Orr

Abstract

Standard discrete choice demand models assume that all products are substitutes. Merger analyses based on these models may overstate consumer harm. We develop an estimator that identifies demand complementarity and remains computationally feasible with large choice sets. We apply this estimator to the chips and soda market and find a high degree of complementarity between these product groups. We show that a counterfactual merger ignoring complementarity between PepsiCo/Frito‐Lay and Dr. Pepper generates price increases for soda that are 33% larger than a model with complementarity, and that post‐merger chip prices decrease when accounting for complementarity.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Ershov & Jean‐William Laliberté & Mathieu Marcoux & Scott Orr, 2025. "Estimating Complementarity With Large Choice Sets: An Application to Mergers," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 56(4), pages 689-707, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:randje:v:56:y:2025:i:4:p:689-707
    DOI: 10.1111/1756-2171.70024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.70024
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1756-2171.70024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:randje:v:56:y:2025:i:4:p:689-707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/randdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.