IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/pstrev/v12y2014i1p6-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Progressivism: An Idea Whose Time has Gone?

Author

Listed:
  • David Blaazer

Abstract

type="main"> All three main parties at the 2010 British election attempted to describe themselves as ‘progressive’. While this term has generally been reserved for left-of-centre politics, such claims compel some re-examination in order to establish whether the term still has any meaning or analytical value. The author's earlier study of the progressive tradition during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century located it in a range of organisations, and especially in the shifting boundary between the Liberal and Labour Parties. Progressivism in this period was characterised by profound commitments to anti-imperialism and anti-sectionalism, combined with an empirical approach to the possible benefits of state intervention in the economy, and an open and fluid attitude to organisational affiliations. Progressive principles have enjoyed little success in recent years, especially with respect to the Iraq War and government support of the City's sectional interests. While these defeats do not in themselves signify the disappearance of progressive principles or even the progressive tradition, which are clearly manifest in many contemporary movements, the constellation of beliefs that characterised ‘progressivism’, together with its underlying moral purpose, has disappeared, as has the specific political context that gave rise to it.

Suggested Citation

  • David Blaazer, 2014. "Progressivism: An Idea Whose Time has Gone?," Political Studies Review, Political Studies Association, vol. 12(1), pages 6-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:pstrev:v:12:y:2014:i:1:p:6-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1478-9302.12040
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:pstrev:v:12:y:2014:i:1:p:6-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1478-9299 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.