IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/presci/v52y1983i1p125-137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Land Reclamation Plans For Northern Friesland: An Interregional Cost‐Benefit And Input‐Output Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Oosterhaven

Abstract

ABSTRACT For land outside the sea‐dikes of the northern part of the province of Friesland five alternative land‐reclamation plans have been made. Agricultural organizations and the Province are in favour of the larger plans because of their expected economic benefits, which mainly accrue to arable farming — wholesale and processing. Environmental organizations are against these plans because of the expected damage to the valuable natural environment of the Dutch Shallows. The plans proposed primarily serve regional interests, have large indirect economic effects, and are finally decided upon by central government. It is argued that for an economic evaluation of such projects an integrated interregional cost‐benefit and input‐output analysis is most adequate. Under the present Dutch administrative and financial lack of decentralization, it appears to make a great difference whether the cost‐benefit analyses are made from a regional point of veiw or made from the more usual national standpoint.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Oosterhaven, 1983. "Evaluating Land Reclamation Plans For Northern Friesland: An Interregional Cost‐Benefit And Input‐Output Analysis," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 125-137, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:presci:v:52:y:1983:i:1:p:125-137
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1983.tb01654.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1983.tb01654.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1983.tb01654.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:presci:v:52:y:1983:i:1:p:125-137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1056-8190 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.