IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/popmgt/v28y2019i3p721-739.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

First‐Price Split‐Award Auctions in Procurement Markets with Economies of Scale: An Experimental Study

Author

Listed:
  • Gian‐Marco Kokott
  • Martin Bichler
  • Per Paulsen

Abstract

We experimentally study first‐price split‐award auction formats as they can be found in procurement markets where suppliers have economies of scale. Our analysis includes sequential and combinatorial auctions, which allow for bids on the package of two shares and single shares. We derive equilibrium predictions as hypotheses for bidder behavior in our laboratory experiments. These equilibrium predictions help explain important patterns in our experimental results. The combinatorial first‐price sealed‐bid auction yields lower prices than the other mechanisms and is highly efficient independent of the extent of scale economies. With strong economies of scale both combinatorial auction formats let the auctioneer incur significantly lower procurement costs and generate high efficiency compared to the sequential auction. We also find high efficiency of the combinatorial first‐price sealed‐bid auction in experiments with diseconomies of scale, making these auctions attractive if the buyer has uncertainty about the economies of scale in a market. Our analysis shows that combinatorial split‐award auctions can be an attractive alternative for the buyer compared to their sequential counterparts.

Suggested Citation

  • Gian‐Marco Kokott & Martin Bichler & Per Paulsen, 2019. "First‐Price Split‐Award Auctions in Procurement Markets with Economies of Scale: An Experimental Study," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(3), pages 721-739, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:28:y:2019:i:3:p:721-739
    DOI: 10.1111/poms.12947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12947
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/poms.12947?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:28:y:2019:i:3:p:721-739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1937-5956 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.