IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/popdev/v51y2025i3p1141-1169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Couples’ Subjective Well‐Being Around Live Birth and Pregnancy Loss

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro Di Nallo

Abstract

This study examines the trajectories of subjective well‐being (SWB) of women and their partners transitioning to parenthood or remaining childless after experiencing pregnancy loss in the United Kingdom. Childbearing is generally associated with short‐term improvements in women's and men's SWB. However, less is known about couples’ well‐being dynamics before and after pregnancies ending in losses, despite 10–20 percent of the pregnancies that occurred in high‐income countries terminating spontaneously. Using fixed‐effects linear regressions, the study analyses first‐time pregnancies of women recorded across the 13 waves of the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS), from 2009 to 2023 (N = 18,897 observations for women and N = 11,223 for men). The results indicate that there are differences in SWB trajectories based on pregnancy outcomes, with mothers showing better SWB compared to women who experience pregnancy loss. The involuntary terminations negatively impact two indicators of women's SWB (mental health and life satisfaction) upon pregnancy loss, while women who had a live birth experience an increase in SWB around childbearing. Partners are less affected by pregnancy loss, though the effects on life satisfaction scores may be more persistent. These results suggest that the well‐being consequences of pregnancy loss are primarily, but not exclusively, shouldered by women.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro Di Nallo, 2025. "Couples’ Subjective Well‐Being Around Live Birth and Pregnancy Loss," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 51(3), pages 1141-1169, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:popdev:v:51:y:2025:i:3:p:1141-1169
    DOI: 10.1111/padr.70010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.70010
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/padr.70010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popdev:v:51:y:2025:i:3:p:1141-1169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0098-7921 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.