IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/popdev/v51y2025i2p858-888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the Gender Equality–Fertility Paradox in Three Nordic Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Katia Begall
  • Nicole Hiekel

Abstract

The accelerating fertility decline in the most gender‐equal countries of the world seemingly contradicts the central tenet of macro‐level theories that predict high fertility in the presence of gender equality. We offer a comprehensive assessment of the individual behavior from which these trends aggregate. We link attitudes toward gender roles and fertility intentions in three Nordic countries. Using recent data (2020–2022) and a multidimensional instrument on gender equality attitudes from the Generations and Gender Programme for Denmark, Finland, and Norway on n = 13,184 women and men, we identify three attitude profiles of which one is situated beyond the “non‐egalitarian–egalitarian continuum.” The profiles are clearly associated with fertility intentions for childless individuals. We further provide evidence for two theoretical mechanisms that intervene between gender equality attitudes and fertility intentions. Gender‐equal societies with a favorable opportunity structure for people to have the children they want may still face challenges associated with low fertility: Fertility intentions are lowest among egalitarians, that is, the largest population in these countries. While realizing a satisfying division of household labor with their partner enhances fertility intentions among egalitarians more than in the other groups, they do not necessarily prioritize parenthood as their main life objective.

Suggested Citation

  • Katia Begall & Nicole Hiekel, 2025. "Examining the Gender Equality–Fertility Paradox in Three Nordic Countries," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 51(2), pages 858-888, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:popdev:v:51:y:2025:i:2:p:858-888
    DOI: 10.1111/padr.12721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12721
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/padr.12721?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popdev:v:51:y:2025:i:2:p:858-888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0098-7921 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.