Author
Listed:
- Jenny Chanfreau
- Alice Goisis
- Øystein Kravdal
Abstract
Against the backdrop of the rising use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), we argue that more reflection on the measurement and conceptualization of the contribution of ART to fertility rates is warranted. First, despite evidence of marked sociodemographic stratification in ART use, research on the ART contribution to fertility rates has largely overlooked how ART contributes differently to fertility levels across sociodemographic groups. Second, existing work tends to be ambiguous regarding what fertility would have looked like if ART had not been available. We demonstrate the importance of these points through period (1986–2018) and cohort (women born in 1949–1974) analyses using data from the Norwegian Population Registers. We demonstrate empirically the absolute and relative variation in the contribution of ART to fertility across sociodemographic subgroups. Whereas the relative ART contribution was highest and increasing steeply in recent years for women 40+, in absolute terms it was substantially higher for women in their thirties. Unlike natural fertility, differences in the absolute contribution of ART to the fertility of education groups were increasing over time. Then, considering a range of assumptions, we show that the “crude” contribution of ART may be either an overestimation or an underestimation compared to the “net” contribution. Our results prompt important reflections on how ART is framed in policy and scholarship.
Suggested Citation
Jenny Chanfreau & Alice Goisis & Øystein Kravdal, 2025.
"Conceptualizing and Measuring the Contribution of Assisted Reproductive Technologies to Fertility Rates,"
Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 51(2), pages 828-857, June.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:popdev:v:51:y:2025:i:2:p:828-857
DOI: 10.1111/padr.70009
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popdev:v:51:y:2025:i:2:p:828-857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0098-7921 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.