IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/polstu/v57y2009i3p473-497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Multicultural State We're In: Muslims, ‘Multiculture’ and the ‘Civic Re‐balancing’ of British Multiculturalism

Author

Listed:
  • Nasar Meer
  • Tariq Modood

Abstract

British multiculturalism is alleged to have buckled under various Muslim‐related pressures. Indeed, some intellectuals, commentators and politicians of different political persuasions have pointed to evidence of a ‘retreat’ to be found in an increased governmental emphasis upon ‘integration’ and ‘social cohesion’. One response to these developments, from defenders of diversity‐related politics, has comprised a discursive reorientation of British multiculturalism to focus upon an anti‐essentialist ‘multiculture’ that can transcend the alleged hitherto reification of British multiculturalism. This article offers an alternative appraisal of British multiculturalism. We contest the idea that British multiculturalism is subject to a wholesale ‘retreat’ and suggest instead that it has been, and continues to be, subject to a productive critique that is resulting in something best characterised as a ‘civic re‐balancing’. Simultaneously, and rather than seeking comfort in a depoliticised ‘multiculture’ view, we defend the ideal of a dynamic political multiculturalism, comprised of a body of discourses and policies originating from a racial equality paradigm inaugurated by the first Race Relations Act (1965). It is argued that this tradition has successfully and legislatively embedded a recognition of ‘difference’– with the goal of promoting equality of access and opportunity – into Britain's self‐image which has led to some significant accommodations for certain groups. Muslim minorities are currently appealing to this tradition as one means of achieving greater civic inclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Nasar Meer & Tariq Modood, 2009. "The Multicultural State We're In: Muslims, ‘Multiculture’ and the ‘Civic Re‐balancing’ of British Multiculturalism," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(3), pages 473-497, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:57:y:2009:i:3:p:473-497
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00745.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00745.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00745.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tariq Modood, 2008. "Is multiculturalism dead?," Public Policy Review, Institute for Public Policy Research, vol. 15(2), pages 84-88, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:57:y:2009:i:3:p:473-497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0032-3217 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.