IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/polstu/v56y2008i4p857-880.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overcoming the Conservative Disposition: Oakeshott vs. Tönnies

Author

Listed:
  • Efraim Podoksik

Abstract

Widely considered a conservative British philosopher, this article presents Michael Oakeshott as, in fact, a critic of conservatism – in particular of the German conservative tradition, represented, among other thinkers, by Ferdinand Tönnies. This tradition was characterised by the rejection of modern individualistic society considered as an embodiment of alienating purpose‐oriented rationalism. At a certain phase of his intellectual development Oakeshott himself came under the influence of this conservative critique, with ideas strikingly similar to those of Tönnies. Yet, unlike Tönnies, Oakeshott later rejected the premises of this tradition. Instead, he formulated the notion of rationalistic non‐purposive association, which allowed him to become reconciled to modern liberal society.

Suggested Citation

  • Efraim Podoksik, 2008. "Overcoming the Conservative Disposition: Oakeshott vs. Tönnies," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(4), pages 857-880, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:56:y:2008:i:4:p:857-880
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00699.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00699.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00699.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:56:y:2008:i:4:p:857-880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0032-3217 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.