IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/polstu/v53y2005i1p201-221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Ghosts in McGarry and O’Leary and Representations of the Conflict in Northern Ireland

Author

Listed:
  • Marysia Zalewski

Abstract

This article focuses on how ideas about gender function in academic analyses of the conflict in Northern Ireland. Part of the reason for doing this is to explore the paradox afflicting contemporary feminism, namely that in the midst of apparent success feminism still seems largely irrelevant to matters of political significance. A second reason involves a demonstration of the political value of poststructural feminism. To achieve these aims, I first consider the use and political aims of poststructuralist analyses, partly through an analysis of the use of poetry in social scientific analyses. The main site used to demonstrate the functions of gender and the political possibilities of poststructural feminism is John McGarry and Brendan O’Leary's book Explaining Northern Ireland: Broken Images. The sub‐title of this book refers to a Robert Graves’ poem, ‘In Broken Images’, a poem the authors use to explain their desire to ‘break images’ when explaining the conflict in Northern Ireland. I next reflect on and illustrate how ideas about gender function by focusing primarily on Explaining Northern Ireland: Broken Images. The final section re‐considers the paradox of contemporary feminism, suggesting that feminism's own methodologies contribute towards its persistent marginalisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Marysia Zalewski, 2005. "Gender Ghosts in McGarry and O’Leary and Representations of the Conflict in Northern Ireland," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 53(1), pages 201-221, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:53:y:2005:i:1:p:201-221
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00524.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00524.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00524.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:53:y:2005:i:1:p:201-221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0032-3217 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.