IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/polstu/v53y2005i1p162-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Terrorism Upsets Liberty

Author

Listed:
  • Tamar Meisels

Abstract

As terrorism increasingly penetrates Western democracies, liberals and libertarians are obliged to ask themselves whether contending with it justifies restricting civil liberty and, if so, to what extent. Neither personal security nor individual liberty is ever fully realised – both are a matter of degree – and they are often perceived as being at odds with each other. Hence it has been suggested that we reconsider the existing trade‐off between them, or reassess their ‘rate of exchange’. While such questions are sometimes raised by left‐leaning liberals, they are in fact particularly acute for liberals on the right, or libertarians, who would normally resist any increase in government intervention. Right‐wingers who advocate ‘hands off’ policies on all other occasions now call for an increase in government intervention as regards security measures. Many left‐liberals, on the other hand, are reluctant to concede any further power to the state in order to combat terrorism.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamar Meisels, 2005. "How Terrorism Upsets Liberty," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 53(1), pages 162-181, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:53:y:2005:i:1:p:162-181
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00522.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00522.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00522.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kenneth E. Fernandez & Michele Kuenzi, 2010. "Crime and Support for Democracy in Africa and Latin America," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(3), pages 450-471, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:53:y:2005:i:1:p:162-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0032-3217 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.