IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/polstu/v50y2002i5p959-973.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘A Land without a People’: an Evaluation of Nations’ Efficiency‐based Territorial Claims

Author

Listed:
  • Tamar Meisels

Abstract

This paper considers the role of efficiency arguments in grounding territorial rights from a liberal perspective. The view advanced here is pitted against some recent arguments voiced by Margaret Moore opposing the inclusion of any efficiency criterion in our moral reasoning about territorial entitlement. Though I argue against this view, my own conclusion – favouring the adoption of only a moderated version of such principles – is a relatively mild one. It maintains, on the one hand, that the beneficial use of land is morally relevant to determining its rightful owner, but, on the other hand, it also recognizes the limitations of any such principle of utilization. Ultimately, there are good moral reasons for viewing the way in which a given land has been put to use as a relevant component (though admittedly only one) of our account of territorial entitlement.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamar Meisels, 2002. "‘A Land without a People’: an Evaluation of Nations’ Efficiency‐based Territorial Claims," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 50(5), pages 959-973, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:50:y:2002:i:5:p:959-973
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.00403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00403
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9248.00403?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:50:y:2002:i:5:p:959-973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0032-3217 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.