IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/pbudge/v45y2025i3p36-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Financial Leanness Punished by Bond Credit Rating Agencies? The Nonprofit Dilemma of Balancing Trustworthiness and Creditworthiness

Author

Listed:
  • Qingqing Sun

Abstract

The number of nonprofits utilizing bond markets to fund capital projects has increased in recent years. This study explores how nonprofit financial conditions impact bond credit ratings, using a novel dataset linking ratings to IRS Form 990 Schedule K data. Ordered probit regressions with Heckman correction reveal that financial leanness—characterized by minimized profits, cash flows, and operating revenue—results in weaker credit ratings. These findings challenge the nonprofit sector's norm of financial leanness, showing it may signal trustworthiness to funders but undermines creditworthiness. Consequently, higher borrowing costs hinder nonprofits' ability to expand programs and scale their mission impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingqing Sun, 2025. "Is Financial Leanness Punished by Bond Credit Rating Agencies? The Nonprofit Dilemma of Balancing Trustworthiness and Creditworthiness," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 36-73, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:pbudge:v:45:y:2025:i:3:p:36-73
    DOI: 10.1111/pbaf.12395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12395
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/pbaf.12395?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:pbudge:v:45:y:2025:i:3:p:36-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0275-1100 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.