IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/pacecr/v31y2026i2p137-155.html

Curbing Opportunism With Transparency: Evidence From China's Mandatory Customer Disclosure Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Wenting Zhang

Abstract

This study examines the governance effect of the China Securities Regulatory Commission's 2021 regulation mandating the disclosure of specific customer names. Using a Difference‐in‐Differences approach, we find that the regulatory mandate significantly suppresses the scale of insider selling. Mechanism tests reveal two distinct channels: (1) the “Regulatory Screening” channel, where the inhibitory effect is more pronounced in firms that maintained anonymity than in those that complied; and (2) the “Information Asymmetry” channel, evidenced by a reduction in bid‐ask spreads. Further analysis shows that the policy is most effective in innovation‐driven sectors (e.g., high‐tech, R&D‐intensive firms) where supply chain information is highly sensitive, and in firms with severe agency problems. Conversely, the impact is attenuated in firms that already possess robust monitoring mechanisms, such as high institutional or controlling shareholder ownership. Our results highlight the role of mandatory supply chain disclosure as a robust governance mechanism in curbing opportunistic insider behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenting Zhang, 2026. "Curbing Opportunism With Transparency: Evidence From China's Mandatory Customer Disclosure Regulation," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 137-155, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:pacecr:v:31:y:2026:i:2:p:137-155
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-0106.70015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.70015
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-0106.70015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:pacecr:v:31:y:2026:i:2:p:137-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1361-374X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.