IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/pacecr/v24y2019i4p570-587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tenure Security and Long‐term Investment on Tenanted Land: Evidence from Colonial Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Elliott Fan
  • Shu‐jen Yeh

Abstract

We use farm diary data from Taiwan in the 1920s and 1930s to estimate the impacts of a state‐wide tenancy reform on tenants’ investment in the farmland and production outcome. The reform, commencing in 1922, enhanced the tenure security for the tenants by promoting written contracts that extended tenure length from 1 year to 5–6 years, and by establishing government‐sponsored organizations for dispute settlements. Our estimations rely on a difference‐in‐difference framework, where self‐cultivated farms are used as the control group. We find that the reform encouraged tenants to make investments in the irrigation and drainage system of the farms, which is expected to have long‐lasting benefits for production. The improved irrigation/drainage system led to significant efficiency gains for the farms. In contrast, the reform did not affect tenants’ usage of fertilizer much, which benefits production for only a crop season or a year.

Suggested Citation

  • Elliott Fan & Shu‐jen Yeh, 2019. "Tenure Security and Long‐term Investment on Tenanted Land: Evidence from Colonial Taiwan," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 570-587, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:pacecr:v:24:y:2019:i:4:p:570-587
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-0106.12211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12211
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-0106.12211?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:pacecr:v:24:y:2019:i:4:p:570-587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1361-374X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.