IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/obuest/v88y2026i2p291-330.html

Industrial Relations, Collective Bargaining Agreements, Labour Demand Composition and Local Labour Market Concentration

Author

Listed:
  • Simone Chinetti

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of local labour market concentration on wage and non‐wage attributes, leveraging demand‐side panel data. The analysis replicates the standard findings on wage and hiring elasticity, potentially revealing an additional layer‐abstention from collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) could lead to a double markdown on wage costs. Moreover, employer concentration reduces both employer association membership and union representation within small firms. In concentrated labour markets, there is a higher likelihood of forgoing both first‐tier and second‐tier collective agreements, resulting in adverse effects on workers' wages and non‐wage attributes. Additionally, even when firms use CBAs, strategies to optimise labour costs at the expense of workers emerge, prominently featuring the misalignment of CBAs. Local labour market concentration increases employment practices that optimise and reduce labour costs, such as a greater reliance on part‐time contracts and external consultants. The analysis shows that reduced competition in the labour market influences diverse facets of employment relationships, revealing patterns that extend beyond the conventional understanding of wage and hiring dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Simone Chinetti, 2026. "Industrial Relations, Collective Bargaining Agreements, Labour Demand Composition and Local Labour Market Concentration," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 88(2), pages 291-330, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:obuest:v:88:y:2026:i:2:p:291-330
    DOI: 10.1111/obes.70002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.70002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/obes.70002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:obuest:v:88:y:2026:i:2:p:291-330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfeixuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.