IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/mathfi/v35y2025i4p796-817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Volatility Models in Practice: Rough, Path‐Dependent, or Markovian?

Author

Listed:
  • Eduardo Abi Jaber
  • Shaun (Xiaoyuan) Li

Abstract

We present an empirical study examining several claims related to option prices in rough volatility literature using SPX options data. Our results show that rough volatility models with the parameter H∈(0,1/2)$H \in (0,1/2)$ are inconsistent with the global shape of SPX smiles. In particular, the at‐the‐money SPX skew is incompatible with the power‐law shape generated by these models, which increases too fast for short maturities and decays too slowly for longer maturities. For maturities between 1 week and 3 months, rough volatility models underperform one‐factor Markovian models with the same number of parameters. When extended to longer maturities, rough volatility models do not consistently outperform one‐factor Markovian models. Our study identifies a non‐rough path‐dependent model and a two‐factor Markovian model that outperform their rough counterparts in capturing SPX smiles between 1 week and 3 years, with only three to four parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduardo Abi Jaber & Shaun (Xiaoyuan) Li, 2025. "Volatility Models in Practice: Rough, Path‐Dependent, or Markovian?," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 796-817, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:mathfi:v:35:y:2025:i:4:p:796-817
    DOI: 10.1111/mafi.12463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/mafi.12463
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/mafi.12463?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:mathfi:v:35:y:2025:i:4:p:796-817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0960-1627 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.