IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/manchs/v88y2020i2p305-323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Growth and development under different corruption regimes

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan Wang

Abstract

This paper explicitly models four different corruption regimes according to the way in which corruption is practised. It distinguishes between organized and disorganized, collusive and non‐collusive corruption. The implications of these are compared and contrasted to provide ranking regarding their impacts on growth. Corruption is always bad, but the extent of the detrimental effect on growth is sensitive to the corruption regime observed. The least (or most) damaging regime is the one in which corruption is both organized and collusive (or disorganized and non‐collusive), as broadly characterizes the situation in China and its fast‐growing neighbours (or some African countries). An effective anti‐corruption policy should focus on fighting embezzlement and discretionary rent‐seeking first, which will dramatically reduce the adverse effect of corruption on growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan Wang, 2020. "Growth and development under different corruption regimes," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 88(2), pages 305-323, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:manchs:v:88:y:2020:i:2:p:305-323
    DOI: 10.1111/manc.12302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12302
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/manc.12302?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Igor Fedotenkov & Rangan Gupta, 2021. "The effects of public expenditures on labour productivity in Europe," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 48(4), pages 845-874, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:manchs:v:88:y:2020:i:2:p:305-323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/semanuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.