IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/manchs/v70y2002i1p115-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing for ‘Monopoly’ Market Power when Products Are Differentiated in Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Verboven

Abstract

This paper proposes a reduced form approach to identify the presence of ‘monopoly’ market power in markets with vertical product differentiation. In a general model I derive an explicit solution for the reduced form pricing equations under the hypothesis that prices are set to maximize the joint profits of all products. The central comparative statics result states that each product’s price depends only on its own quality and not on the quality of its competitors. This contrasts with the solution under Bertrand–Nash behaviour and thus provides an identification argument for conduct under vertical product differentiation. I propose empirical tests implied by this result. They require only the data used in popular hedonic studies (prices and physical characteristics). The tests are applied to the US market for spreadsheets and to the French market for optional car engines.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Verboven, 2002. "Testing for ‘Monopoly’ Market Power when Products Are Differentiated in Quality," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 70(1), pages 115-133, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:manchs:v:70:y:2002:i:1:p:115-133
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9957.00287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9957.00287
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9957.00287?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Prentice & Xiangkang Yin, 2004. "Constructing a Quality‐Adjusted Price Index for a Heterogeneous Oligopoly," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 72(4), pages 423-442, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:manchs:v:70:y:2002:i:1:p:115-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/semanuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.