Author
Listed:
- Eline Moens
- Louis Lippens
- Kathleen Vangronsvelt
- Ans De Vos
- Stijn Baert
Abstract
At a time when numerous organisations are urging a return to the office while many employees prefer to continue teleworking, it is crucial to ascertain the optimal level of telework intensity. In the present study, we determine this ideal level with respect to self‐rated employee attitudes, behaviour, well‐being, social relations and professional growth. Drawing on a five‐wave longitudinal dataset, we apply fixed effects regression analyses to investigate associations between telework intensity and various dimensions of workplace experience. We offer more robust empirical evidence for favouring hybrid work schedules over office‐only or telework‐only regimes, owing to significant advances in causal inference for linear and non‐linear associations compared to the majority of existing studies that examine linear associations based on cross‐sectional data. Our results point toward modest inverted U‐shaped associations between telework intensity and self‐rated job satisfaction, work–life balance, relationships with colleagues and professional development, with optimal levels peaking around 50% teleworking. For task efficiency and work concentration, the association appears to be concave with a plateau, stabilising at teleworking levels above 70%. Only between telework intensity and employer connectedness do we observe a slightly negative linear association. Age emerges as the most prominent moderator, with within‐person increases in telework intensity being evaluated slightly more positively with increasing age across several workplace outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Eline Moens & Louis Lippens & Kathleen Vangronsvelt & Ans De Vos & Stijn Baert, 2026.
"Too Much of a Good Thing? Telework Intensity and Workplace Experiences,"
Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(3), pages 828-841, August.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:79:y:2026:i:3:p:828-841
DOI: 10.1111/kykl.70061
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:79:y:2026:i:3:p:828-841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0023-5962 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.