Author
Listed:
- Leonardo Becchetti
- Demetrio Bova
- Lorenzo Semplici
Abstract
This paper examines the relationship between four freedom orientations—libertarian, utilitarian, civic, and communitarian—and subjective well‐being. We conceptualize liberty orientations as varying in their prioritization of individual autonomy relative to the general interest. Using nationally representative survey data, we estimate a recursive generalized structural equation model (GSEM) with instrumental variables to address potential endogeneity between liberty orientations and well‐being. Falsification tests confirm the validity of our instruments. The results indicate that civic and communitarian orientations are positively and significantly associated with higher levels of life satisfaction compared to libertarian and utilitarian orientations. The fit between freedom orientations and local institutional quality matters since living in areas with low institutional quality reduces the positive nexus between being civic or communitarian and subjective well‐being. Our findings suggest that the value‐context fit and value systems emphasizing voluntary alignment with, or prioritization of, the general interest foster higher well‐being, consistent with research strands highlighting the importance of social relationships, generativity, procedural utility, and collective purpose discussed in the paper. Our contribution is both theoretical, by refining the typology of liberty orientations, and empirical, by providing causal evidence of their effects on subjective well‐being.
Suggested Citation
Leonardo Becchetti & Demetrio Bova & Lorenzo Semplici, 2026.
"Freedom Types and Life Satisfaction: Empirical Evidence on the Role of Individual and Civic‐Oriented Values,"
Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(3), pages 655-675, August.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:79:y:2026:i:3:p:655-675
DOI: 10.1111/kykl.70051
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:79:y:2026:i:3:p:655-675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0023-5962 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.