IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/kyklos/v79y2026i3p636-654.html

Why Do Prosocial People Dislike Markets in Some Countries and Like Them in Others?

Author

Listed:
  • Pál Czeglédi

Abstract

Based on the doux commerce thesis, which suggests that people in market‐oriented societies hold stronger prosocial values than those in less market‐oriented ones, one can expect prosocial and pro‐market values to be positively associated. The fact that the association holds for cross‐country observations but does not universally hold for cross‐individual observations within countries is a puzzle, the paper argues, and it explains this by assuming that market preferences are expressive. It argues that this assumption implies that the link between prosocial and pro‐market values should vary with national institutions because the latter reflect prevailing beliefs about markets. The prediction is tested by individual‐level regressions that use post‐materialism and generalised trust as indicators of prosocial values and ownership preferences as an indicator of pro‐market values from the International Values Survey. The regressions support the prediction by showing that the within‐country association between these values can be either positive or negative, depending on institutional context and political identity. The moral consequences of markets, therefore, are a key part of the argument for them.

Suggested Citation

  • Pál Czeglédi, 2026. "Why Do Prosocial People Dislike Markets in Some Countries and Like Them in Others?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(3), pages 636-654, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:79:y:2026:i:3:p:636-654
    DOI: 10.1111/kykl.70049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.70049
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/kykl.70049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:79:y:2026:i:3:p:636-654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0023-5962 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.