IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/kyklos/v79y2026i2p478-499.html

Does Banking Diversity Matter for Credit Access? Evidence on SMES in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Trivieri

Abstract

This paper investigates SMEs' access to credit from the perspective of the biodiversity argument in banking, a conceptual framework that has been largely overlooked in the literature. Using bank‐ and firm‐level data for eight European countries from 2014 to 2022, I empirically assess the role of bank diversity—measured by the Gini‐Simpson index, in analogy with ecological diversity—on the probability of SMEs being credit rationed. My results indicate that institutional heterogeneity within the banking sector mitigates credit constraints faced by SMEs while also increasing firms' propensity to apply for bank loans. These findings align with the core tenet of the biodiversity approach, which posits that a banking landscape marked by a plurality of institutional forms represents a valuable asset for financing the real economy. In light of my evidence, preserving and fostering institutional diversity within the banking sector should be regarded as a policy priority.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Trivieri, 2026. "Does Banking Diversity Matter for Credit Access? Evidence on SMES in Europe," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(2), pages 478-499, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:79:y:2026:i:2:p:478-499
    DOI: 10.1111/kykl.70043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.70043
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/kykl.70043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:79:y:2026:i:2:p:478-499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0023-5962 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.