IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/kyklos/v79y2026i2p357-376.html

Government Spending and Civic Engagement: Exploring the Role of Civil Society Participation and Voting in 28 Democracies

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Lo Prete
  • Agnese Sacchi

Abstract

This study offers causal evidence on how distinct forms of civic engagement affect government spending across 28 democracies between 2000 and 2024. Its main innovation lies in disentangling the fiscal effects of two channels of engagement—civil society participation and electoral turnout—through an original identification strategy that exploits exogenous variation in collective versus self‐interested motives. Our findings reveal that civic engagement exerts distinct effects on public spending depending on the channel through which citizens participate in democratic life. On the one hand, stronger participation in civil society associations leads to higher government spending, consistent with a publicly spirited and collective mobilisation effect. On the other hand, greater electoral participation is associated with lower public expenditure, as more collective‐interested individuals distance themselves from the traditional electoral channel, and more self‐interested individuals ask for less public spending. We explore these underlying mechanisms, propose strategies to address key identification challenges and further consider the impact of civic engagement on environmental protection and green politics dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Lo Prete & Agnese Sacchi, 2026. "Government Spending and Civic Engagement: Exploring the Role of Civil Society Participation and Voting in 28 Democracies," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(2), pages 357-376, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:79:y:2026:i:2:p:357-376
    DOI: 10.1111/kykl.70027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.70027
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/kykl.70027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Federica Lanterna & Giovanni Marin & Agnese Sacchi, 2026. "Decentralising environmental public spending: from political platforms to actual policies in the EU countries," SEEDS Working Papers 0526, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Feb 2026.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:79:y:2026:i:2:p:357-376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0023-5962 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.