IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/kyklos/v23y1970i1p75-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

More On The Equivalence Of Tariffs And Quotas

Author

Listed:
  • Mordechai E. Kreinin

Abstract

Recent discussions in the literature on tariffs and quotas generally conclude that under competitive market conditions the two policy measures are equivalent, while equivalence in one sense or another breaks down with the introduction of monopoly into one or more markets involved in international trade. This paper shows that this is a misleading conclusion, based entirely on the static nature of the analysis. With partial equilibrium tools it is shown that if changes in demand are allowed for, the two measures give different results. The welfare loss from a quota is more severe than that from a tariff. And under certain restricted conditions a quota can be likened more to exchange control than to a tariff.

Suggested Citation

  • Mordechai E. Kreinin, 1970. "More On The Equivalence Of Tariffs And Quotas," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 75-79, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:23:y:1970:i:1:p:75-79
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1970.tb02546.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1970.tb02546.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1970.tb02546.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:23:y:1970:i:1:p:75-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0023-5962 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.