IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jtsera/v46y2025i6p1175-1204.html

Testing in GARCH‐X models: boundary, correlations and bootstrap theory

Author

Listed:
  • Heino Bohn Nielsen
  • Rasmus Søndergaard Pedersen
  • Anders Rahbek
  • Sigurd Nellemann Thorsen

Abstract

In this article, we consider the so‐called Fixed Shrinkage (FS) bootstrap for the class of GARCH models with explanatory variables (GARCH‐X). Under the assumption of stationary covariates, the proposed FS bootstrap does not require modeling the covariates, as these are kept fixed in the bootstrap generating process. Our main focus is on testing whether one or more of the covariates can be excluded in the GARCH‐X model. As is well‐known the limiting distribution of the likelihood‐ratio (LR) statistic in this setting is non‐standard and depends in particular on whether nuisance parameters are on the boundary or in the interior of the parameter space. In particular, and as detailed here, the non‐standard limiting distribution depends on correlations, or dependence, between the explanatory variables. The FS bootstrap takes the presence of nuisance parameters into account by implementing shrinking as proposed in Cavaliere et al. (2022) for pure ARCH models. We establish asymptotic validity of the FS bootstrap for GARCH‐X models, and demonstrate by simulations that the bootstrap‐based test performs extremely well even when nuisance parameters lie on the boundary of the parameter space. The empirical illustration amplifies that the presence of nuisance parameters (especially whether or not on the boundary) are vital for interpreting the dynamics of conditional volatility in financial stock market indices.

Suggested Citation

  • Heino Bohn Nielsen & Rasmus Søndergaard Pedersen & Anders Rahbek & Sigurd Nellemann Thorsen, 2025. "Testing in GARCH‐X models: boundary, correlations and bootstrap theory," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(6), pages 1175-1204, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jtsera:v:46:y:2025:i:6:p:1175-1204
    DOI: 10.1111/jtsa.12767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsa.12767
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jtsa.12767?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jtsera:v:46:y:2025:i:6:p:1175-1204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0143-9782 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.